In an era where smartphones and the internet are practically extensions of ourselves, one of India’s most powerful figures, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, stands apart by refusing to use either in his daily work. This revelation, made during the Viksit Bharat Young Leaders Dialogue 2026, has sparked curiosity and debate. But here’s where it gets even more intriguing: Doval’s decision isn’t just a personal preference—it’s a calculated move rooted in decades of experience in intelligence and national security. When asked about his unconventional approach during a Q&A session at Bharat Mandapam, Doval confirmed, ‘I do not use the internet, and I avoid mobile phones except for family matters or essential international communication.’ He emphasized that his work relies on alternative, often undisclosed, methods of communication. And this is the part most people miss: In a world where cyber threats loom large, Doval’s choice could be a masterclass in minimizing vulnerabilities. But is this approach feasible for everyone, or is it a luxury only a few can afford? Let’s dive deeper.
Ajit Doval, India’s fifth National Security Advisor, is no stranger to high-stakes situations. A retired Indian Police Service (IPS) officer from the Kerala cadre, he has spent over five decades in intelligence, internal security, and counter-terrorism. Born in Uttarakhand in 1945, Doval joined the IPS in 1968 and quickly distinguished himself, becoming the youngest officer to receive the Kirti Chakra for bravery. His career is a testament to his unwavering commitment to national security, from tackling insurgencies in Mizoram, Punjab, and the Northeast to playing pivotal roles in the 2016 surgical strikes and the 2019 Balakot airstrikes. He also negotiated during the 1999 IC-814 hijacking crisis in Kandahar and spent years working undercover in Pakistan. Controversially, some argue that his avoidance of modern technology could hinder efficiency in today’s fast-paced world. But Doval’s track record suggests otherwise—could his methods be a blueprint for secure communication in an age of cyber warfare?
Interestingly, Doval’s stance on technology was thrust into the spotlight last year when a fake Facebook post, falsely attributed to him, warned of an impending cyberattack from Pakistan. The Press Information Bureau (PIB) swiftly debunked the post, clarifying that Doval has no official social media presence. This incident underscores the risks of digital misinformation and highlights why Doval might prefer to stay off the grid. But here’s a thought-provoking question: In a world where leaders are increasingly accessible online, does Doval’s detachment from digital platforms make him more secure—or less connected? Share your thoughts in the comments below. Whether you agree or disagree, one thing is clear: Ajit Doval’s approach to technology is as unconventional as it is compelling, leaving us with much to ponder about the future of security and communication.
